Social Mobility and Dynamism Index

{
  "buyer": {
    "id": "GB-PPON-PDLB-8544-PLQT",
    "name": "Social Mobility Commission"
  },
  "date": "2026-03-03T13:29:06Z",
  "id": "018930-2026",
  "initiationType": "tender",
  "language": "en",
  "ocid": "ocds-h6vhtk-0660d8",
  "parties": [
    {
      "address": {
        "country": "GB",
        "countryName": "United Kingdom",
        "locality": "London",
        "postalCode": "SW1A 2HQ",
        "region": "UKI32",
        "streetAddress": "1 Horse Guards Road"
      },
      "contactPoint": {
        "email": "contact@socialmobilitycommission.gov.uk"
      },
      "details": {
        "classifications": [
          {
            "description": "Public authority - central government",
            "id": "publicAuthorityCentralGovernment",
            "scheme": "UK_CA_TYPE"
          }
        ]
      },
      "id": "GB-PPON-PDLB-8544-PLQT",
      "identifier": {
        "id": "PDLB-8544-PLQT",
        "scheme": "GB-PPON"
      },
      "name": "Social Mobility Commission",
      "roles": [
        "buyer"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "tag": [
    "tender"
  ],
  "tender": {
    "aboveThreshold": false,
    "description": "Project Description:\nThe Social Mobility Commission (SMC) monitors progress towards improving social mobility in the UK and promotes social mobility in England. It is an independent statutory body created by an Act of Parliament. \nThe SMC is interested in conducting research to understand how levels of dynamism and innovation vary across the UK. Our desire to produce this stems from a commitment that we made in our EGIG Report, which explored innovation, investment and renewal across the UK. \nBackground:\nThe UK is one of the most regionally unequal economies in the developed world. Productivity in Greater Manchester is 35% below that of London. Closing the productivity gap between Manchester and London to that observed between Lyon and Paris would increase total Gross Value Added (GVA) by \u00a313 billion a year (in 2019 prices), a 0.7 per cent boost to national productivity.\nIn East Yorkshire, the odds of climbing the income ladder are far lower than in Surrey or Sussex. While opportunities for high paying, good careers are largely concentrated in London. If we want a society where talent and effort are rewarded, these cycles must be broken. Business and economic dynamism is central to this task. Dynamic economies are more productive, have greater growth, and higher wages. They also have greater levels of social mobility, discussed next.\nThe definition of \"dynamism\":\nFor the purposes of this work, \"economic dynamism\" is defined as the rate of structural change, fluidity, and renewal within an economy. It is distinct from simple economic growth or historical wealth. A dynamic economy is characterised by creative destruction - the continuous churn of business creation and closure, the rapid reallocation of labour to more productive uses, and the physical and demographic capacity to absorb new ideas and talent. The resulting index must measure this velocity and fluidity, identifying which areas of the UK present the fewest structural barriers to new entrants, innovators, and workers seeking upward mobility.\nObjectives\nThe objectives of this research are to:\n1. Generate a single score Social Mobility and Dynamism Index, improving on the US Index of State Dynamism. This should include similar indicators as the US index including core startup rate, share of workers at firms less than five years old, growth in total firms, unique inventors per 1,000 residents, housing permits per 1,000 residents, reallocation rate, labour force participation rate, and migration rate.  However, the Commission is open to include other measures, including but not limited to: Moving average of births and deaths of firms as a % of active firms over the last 5 years; Moving average of housing completions per 1000 residents over the last 5 years; Time-series regression slope of ONS APS labour-force participation rate; Moving average of internal net and international net inward migration over the last 5 years; Moving average of the share of firms aged 5 and under over the last 5 years; Moving average of jobs created plus jobs destroyed, divided by work-age population; Time-series regression slope of proportion of adults with Level 4+ qualifications; Time-series regression slope of GVA per head.\nOther metrics that should be considered include the Commission\u0027s Promising Prospects (PP) composite index. The PP index measures how well young people from similar socio-economic backgrounds do in education and the labour market, and is used in the SMC\u0027s annual State of the Nation publication. It is also available as an interactive dashboard on the SMC website. \nThe Social Mobility and Dynamism Index should be available at different spatial levels such as Local Authority, Mayoral Combined Authority/Mayoral Strategic Authority, ITL3, and ITL1.\nIt should also be interactive and allows users to understand how each of the components of the index interact and influence each other.  The index should allow us to better understand how specific strengths and/or weaknesses are related to the local socio-economic context, and to look for comparators across different parts of the UK. The index also needs to look at change over time. The idea is to capture improvement and growth, not just the top of the performance table, which will always favour London and the South East. \n2, Produce a full technical report and additional lay technical document detailing methodology used. These should include details on each of the indicators, the data used, the strengths and weaknesses of the approach. \n3. Produce a detailed report which outlines key findings and an accompanying full dataset with all findings. This should also outline why the Social Mobility and Dynamism Index is important, and how to interpret its results. \nDeliverables:\n- Deliverable 1: The supplier will provide an analysis plan for the proposed research. This will include a robust and rigorous quantitative methodology. \n- Deliverable 2: Construction of an interactive single score Social Mobility and Dynamism index (online tool) which brings together all the indicators outlined in the objectives. This should be produced in R (or similar) as a prototype and be compatible with the SMC website, where it will be uploaded. This should meet our accessibility guidelines.\n- Deliverable 3: A cleaned dataset in a separate CSV or spreadsheet containing all the data in the index is also required.\n- Deliverable 4: A technical specification document outlining the methodology in detailed terms and lay summary presented alongside which explains each step required to produce the index.\n- Deliverable 5:  A final report and support with dissemination. We require the supplier to conduct all of the drafting of the report. \nMore information is available in the attached tender notice document.\nBidders must submit their Bids before 12:00 midday on 25th March 2026. All Bids must be submitted to contact@socialmobilitycommission.gov.uk. Failure to return Bids by the time and due date or in the required format may disqualify Bidders from consideration.",
    "documents": [
      {
        "description": "Please review this document for additional information around the tender notice.",
        "documentType": "biddingDocuments",
        "format": "application/pdf",
        "id": "A-12819",
        "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/A-12819"
      },
      {
        "datePublished": "2026-03-03T13:29:06Z",
        "description": "Tender notice on Find a Tender",
        "documentType": "tenderNotice",
        "format": "text/html",
        "id": "018930-2026",
        "noticeType": "UK4",
        "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/018930-2026"
      }
    ],
    "enquiryPeriod": {
      "endDate": "2026-03-16T12:00:00Z"
    },
    "id": "SMC-2526-105",
    "items": [
      {
        "additionalClassifications": [
          {
            "description": "Social research services",
            "id": "79315000",
            "scheme": "CPV"
          }
        ],
        "deliveryAddresses": [
          {
            "country": "GB",
            "countryName": "United Kingdom",
            "region": "UK"
          }
        ],
        "id": "1",
        "relatedLot": "1"
      }
    ],
    "legalBasis": {
      "id": "2023/54",
      "scheme": "UKPGA",
      "uri": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/54/contents"
    },
    "lots": [
      {
        "awardCriteria": {
          "criteria": [
            {
              "description": "Financial scoring represents 20% of the overall evaluation. The bidder with the lowest overall price will receive 20 marks, and all other bids will be marked as a proportional variance from the top-scoring bid. The formula being used for Relative Assessment for this procurement is: \nBid Score = (Lowest Price/bid price) x 20 \nE.g. a bid that is 10% more expensive will receive 18 marks; one that is twice the price will receive 10 marks",
              "name": "Financial scoring",
              "numbers": [
                {
                  "number": 20,
                  "weight": "percentageExact"
                }
              ],
              "type": "cost"
            },
            {
              "description": "- Demonstrates a clear understanding of the objectives and approaches outlined \n- Creative and constructive thinking is demonstrated by the proposed approach to this project in meeting the objectives \n- The suitability of the proposed approach to deliver against requirements, and identification of any opportunities to add value to this \n- Clear articulation of methods used to garner particular findings, with reference to datasets and analytical techniques used.",
              "name": "Does the proposal  describe a robust method/suitable  approach?",
              "numbers": [
                {
                  "number": 20,
                  "weight": "percentageExact"
                }
              ],
              "type": "quality"
            },
            {
              "description": "- Demonstrate experience of the team doing relevant work \n- Evidence of experience in the challenges and considerations involved in this work \n- How the skills and expertise of the team will be used and managed to best effect (where there is a partnership Please include specifics about how this will be managed, add value and any experience of successful collaboration. \n- Specifics about the methodology and quality assurance process",
              "name": "Team and  organisational  experience in conducting  similar work",
              "numbers": [
                {
                  "number": 20,
                  "weight": "percentageExact"
                }
              ],
              "type": "quality"
            },
            {
              "description": "- That the risks and challenges are considered, and mitigation is integrated into the proposed methodology \n- Consideration of security, confidentiality and data protection.",
              "name": "Risks and  mitigations and data protection",
              "numbers": [
                {
                  "number": 8,
                  "weight": "percentageExact"
                }
              ],
              "type": "quality"
            },
            {
              "description": "- Clear articulation of plans for presenting work in a  clear way \n- Evidence of ability to deliver high-quality research, fieldwork and outputs \n- Ability to present findings clearly in both writing and visual formats (e.g. PowerPoints tailored to a range of audiences - policy makers, analysts, commissioners, wider secretariat \u0026 public).",
              "name": "Presentation",
              "numbers": [
                {
                  "number": 16,
                  "weight": "percentageExact"
                }
              ],
              "type": "quality"
            },
            {
              "description": "- Clear plan for communication and demonstration of a collaborative approach to taking the work forward, working closely with SMC as appropriate \n- Evidence of organisational capacity, project management and quality assurance procedures, to deliver the project in the specified timescales and quality \n- The quality, timing and suitability of proposed outputs.",
              "name": "Project  management",
              "numbers": [
                {
                  "number": 16,
                  "weight": "percentageExact"
                }
              ],
              "type": "quality"
            }
          ]
        },
        "contractPeriod": {
          "endDate": "2027-01-22T23:59:59Z",
          "maxExtentDate": "2027-07-22T23:59:59+01:00",
          "startDate": "2026-05-05T00:00:00+01:00"
        },
        "hasRenewal": true,
        "id": "1",
        "renewal": {
          "description": "A potential 6-month extension will be permitted, but only in negotiations with the winning supplier and only for time, not additional costs."
        },
        "status": "active",
        "suitability": {
          "sme": true,
          "vcse": true
        },
        "value": {
          "amount": 70000,
          "amountGross": 84000,
          "currency": "GBP"
        }
      }
    ],
    "mainProcurementCategory": "services",
    "otherRequirements": {
      "reservedParticipationLocation": {
        "description": null,
        "gazetteer": {
          "identifiers": [
            "K02000001"
          ],
          "scheme": "GB-ONS"
        }
      }
    },
    "procurementMethod": "open",
    "procurementMethodDetails": "Below threshold - open competition",
    "status": "active",
    "submissionMethodDetails": "Bidders must submit their Bids before 12:00 midday on 25th March 2026. All Bids must be submitted to contact@socialmobilitycommission.gov.uk. Failure to return Bids by the time and due date or in the required format may disqualify Bidders from consideration.\nFormat of the bid\nTenderers should present their proposals in the following format: \nSection 1 Summary of Proposal \nSection 2 Meeting the Specification: \nDetails of proposed approach; \n- Methodology including constraints and possible solutions; \n- Project management - Tenderers should indicate how they will monitor the project to ensure it is delivered in terms of quality, timeliness and cost. Tenders must include a work plan/Gantt chart that clearly shows the key activities and milestones leading up to the final report. \n- Staffing, including short staff profiles covering examples of key relevant experience and individual/staff expertise and qualifications. Proposed distribution of duties should be clearly stated if the bid involves sub-contracting or collaboration between different providers; and \n- Outputs, including how the findings will be presented. \nSection 3 Cost and Charging Arrangements \nCosts should be shown separately by deliverables set out above. For example: \n- Deliverable 1: \u00a3 Insert amount\n- Deliverable 2: \u00a3 Insert amount \n- Deliverable 3: \u00a3 Insert amount \n- Deliverable 4: \u00a3 Insert amount \n- Deliverable 5: \u00a3 Insert amount \n- Total: \u00a3 Insert amount \nAll costs should be quoted exclusive of VAT but please indicate if the project will attract VAT. If your proposal includes costs for sub-contractors these costs must be shown inclusive of any VAT element (e.g. sub-contractor\u0027s costs to you are \u00a310K plus VAT, your proposal should show subcontractors costs as \u00a312K inclusive of VAT @ 20%). \nThe department will also conduct its own due diligence checks in relation to the bidder\u0027s financial viability and may request additional financial information to be provided as part of this process. Whilst the department will attempt to mitigate any financial risks it may, at its own discretion, reject a bid where it assesses the financial risk to be too great to proceed with the award of the contract. \nSection 4 Risk Management \n- Outline, in no more than one-page, the key risks to delivering the project and what contingencies will be put in place to deal with them. \n- A risk is any factor that may delay, disrupt or prevent the full achievement of a project objective. All risks should be identified. \n- For each risk, the one-page summary should assess its likelihood (high, medium or low) and specify its possible impact on the project objectives (again rated high, medium or low). The assessment should also identify appropriate actions that would reduce or eliminate each risk or its impact.\n- Typical areas of risk for a research project might include staffing, resource constraints, technical constraints, data access, timing, management and operational issues, but this is not an exhaustive list. \nSection 5 Data Security \n- Provide a plan that explains how departmental and/or personal data will be protected.\n- Provide a copy of your Cyber Essentials Qualification.  \nSection 6 References \nFor the references, the SMC requires relevant examples of similar projects you have completed and how they are similar to this tender. \nSections 1 - 4 should not exceed 10 sides of A4 and sections 5 -6 should not exceed 3 sides of A4, for a combined total of 13 sides. Any bids above that will not be considered. The font size should not be smaller than 10pt. Embedded links will not be considered, nor will Annexes that exceed the 13 page count. \nPlease note that the Social Mobility Commission uses the Government Standard Contracts for Procurement. For this procurement, the Social Mobility Commission will use the Short Form Contract..",
    "submissionTerms": {
      "electronicSubmissionPolicy": "notAllowed"
    },
    "tenderPeriod": {
      "endDate": "2026-03-25T12:00:00Z"
    },
    "title": "Social Mobility and Dynamism Index",
    "value": {
      "amount": 70000,
      "amountGross": 84000,
      "currency": "GBP"
    }
  }
}