Enterprise Service Management (ESM)

{
  "buyer": {
    "id": "GB-PPON-PYRH-9827-DWLP",
    "name": "Cornwall Council"
  },
  "date": "2025-09-18T22:51:06+01:00",
  "id": "057925-2025",
  "initiationType": "tender",
  "language": "en",
  "ocid": "ocds-h6vhtk-059db5",
  "parties": [
    {
      "address": {
        "country": "GB",
        "countryName": "United Kingdom",
        "locality": "Truro",
        "postalCode": "TR1 3AY",
        "region": "UKK30",
        "streetAddress": "County Hall"
      },
      "contactPoint": {
        "email": "Alex.Kirk@cornwall.gov.uk",
        "name": "Mr Alex Kirk",
        "telephone": "01872 322222"
      },
      "details": {
        "classifications": [
          {
            "description": "Public authority - sub-central government",
            "id": "publicAuthoritySubCentralGovernment",
            "scheme": "UK_CA_TYPE"
          }
        ],
        "url": "http://www.cornwall.gov.uk"
      },
      "id": "GB-PPON-PYRH-9827-DWLP",
      "identifier": {
        "id": "PYRH-9827-DWLP",
        "scheme": "GB-PPON"
      },
      "name": "Cornwall Council",
      "roles": [
        "buyer"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "planning": {
    "noEngagementNoticeRationale": "The Authority did not publish a separate preliminary market engagement notice for this procurement, as sufficient engagement had already taken place. An RFI was issued to suppliers on Lot 2: Cloud Software under the CCS TePAS2 Framework (RM6098), with a three-week response period. This exercise informed the procurement strategy, shaped contract requirements, and helped identify the most appropriate route to market. A copy of the RFI is included in the attached procurement documents.\nFollowing this, the Authority issued a cost breakdown template to the same suppliers to gather itemised pricing, which supported internal governance and the development of a robust business case. The template is not included as it adds no value to suppliers.\nThis prior engagement provided sufficient market insight to proceed directly to the formal procurement stage."
  },
  "tag": [
    "tender"
  ],
  "tender": {
    "aboveThreshold": true,
    "awardPeriod": {
      "endDate": "2026-02-09T23:59:59+00:00"
    },
    "contractTerms": {
      "financialTerms": "10.1\tSubject to any provision of this Contract to the contrary (including without limitation those relating to withholding and/or retention), in consideration of the provision of the Services in accordance with the terms of this Contract, the Parties shall comply with their respective obligations under the Payment Schedule.\n10.2\tThe Supplier shall submit Invoices to the Council for payment of the Charges in accordance with the requirements of the Payment Schedule and the Council shall pay the undisputed element of such Invoices within twenty (20) Business Days of receipt. Each Invoice shall contain appropriate references and a detailed breakdown of the Services provided and shall be supported by any other documentation reasonably required by the Council\u2019s Representative to substantiate the entitlement of the Supplier to the amounts claimed in the Invoice.\n10.3\tThe Charges are stated exclusive of VAT, which shall be added at the prevailing rate as applicable and paid by the Council following delivery of a valid VAT invoice.\n10.4\tAny VAT payable by the Council shall be payable at the rate and in the manner for the time being prescribed by law.  All VAT charges must be shown separately in any Invoice clearly identifying what it relates to.\n10.5\tThe Supplier shall indemnify the Council on a continuing basis against any liability, including any interest, penalties or costs incurred, that is levied, demanded or assessed on the Council at any time in respect of the Supplier\u0027s failure to account for or to pay any VAT relating to payments made to the Supplier under this Contract. Any amounts due under this clause 10.5 shall be paid in cleared funds by the Supplier to the Council not less than five (5) Business Days before the date upon which the tax or other liability is payable by the Council.\n10.6\tWhere the Supplier enters into a Sub-Contract with a Sub-Contractor for the purpose of performing its obligations under the Contract, it shall ensure that a provision is included in such Sub-Contact which requires payment to be made of all undisputed sums by the Supplier to the Sub-Contractor within a specified period not exceeding twenty (20) Business Days from the receipt of a valid invoice.\n10.7\tIf a Party, acting in good faith, contests all or any part of any payment calculated in accordance with this clause 10:\n10.7.1 the contesting Party shall within ten (10) Business Days notify the other Party, setting out in reasonable detail the reasons for contesting the requested payment, and in particular identifying which elements are contested and which are not contested; and\n10.7.2 any uncontested amount shall be paid in accordance with this Contract.\n10.8\tIf a Party contests a payment under clause 10.7 and the Parties have not resolved the matter within twenty (20) Business Days of the date of notification under clause 10.7, the contesting Party may refer the matter to Dispute resolution under clause 20 and following the resolution of any dispute referred to Dispute resolution, where applicable, the relevant Party shall pay any amount agreed or determined to be payable in accordance with clause 10.2.\n10.9\tSubject to any express provision of this Contract to the contrary each Party shall be entitled, without prejudice to any other right or remedy it has under this Contract, to receive interest at the Default Interest Rate on any amount due and payable in accordance with this Contract and not paid with effect from the day after the date on which payment was due up to and including the date of payment, whether before or after judgment.\n10.10 The Council may retain or set off any sums owed to it by the Supplier against any sums due to the Supplier under this Contract or any other contract between the Council and the Supplier.\n10.11 The Supplier shall make any payments due to the Council without any deduction whether by way of set-off, counterclaim, discount, abatement or otherwise, unless the Supplier has a valid court order requiring an amount equal to such deduction to be paid by the Council to the Supplier.\n10.12 The implementation of the Charges are fixed. The Council may, however, increase the Charges on an annual basis with effect from each anniversary of the Commencement Date in line with the percentage increase in the CPI in the preceding twelve (12) month period. The first such increase shall take effect at the beginning of the sixth (6th) Contract Year and shall be based on the latest available figure for the percentage increase in the Consumer Prices Index at the beginning of the last month of the previous Contract Year."
    },
    "coveredBy": [
      "GPA",
      "CPTPP"
    ],
    "description": "For over 25 years, the Authority has relied on its existing Information Technology Service Management (ITSM) platform to manage IT services. It has been the backbone of logging, tracking and resolving requests\u2014everything from fixing technical issues to setting up new starters. The technology landscape has moved on: cloud platforms, automation and integrated digital services are now standard, and the Authority now wishes to explore this technology.\nThe Authority is now moving to Enterprise Service Management (ESM). In simple terms, ESM means creating one front door for services\u2014a single, easy\u2011to\u2011use platform where staff and customers can make requests, check progress and get help quickly, regardless of which team provides the service. Behind the scenes, it uses proven good\u2011practice processes (ITIL) to ensure work is handled consistently and efficiently. It will also integrate with tools we already use, enabling automation, clearer customer journeys and, over time, the use of AI to enhance the experience.\nThe Authority\u2019s current version of its ESM platform is hosted on\u2011premise, and the contract ends in March 2026. The Authority\u2019s version of this ESM tool provides a single platform for multiple service areas, not just IT. The Authority\u2019s ambition for this Procurement is to implement, migrate to and continue to support a cloud hosted ESM platform that provides a modern, flexible and integrated approach to organisation wide service delivery. \nThe Authority plans to retire its I.T. Asset Management (ITAM) tool as part of this tender. This will allow the Authority to leverage greater capabilities within a single platform, providing better data for decision\u2011making through modern dashboards and reporting.\nThe Contract is expected to commence on Thursday 19th February 2026 and will run for a core period of five (5) years, unless terminated or extended in accordance with the terms set out in the Contract.\nThe estimated total value of the requirement over the Contract\u2019s five-year core period is \u00a3935,000, which also represents the maximum budget available for Supplier Tenders and the resulting ESM Contract. Any Tender submissions exceeding this value will be rejected in accordance with the assessment criteria outlined in Stage 1: Procurement Specific Questionnaire (PSQ) and Stage 2: Tender Evaluation Criteria.\nThe Contract will have a core period of five (5) years, subject to the termination provisions set out within the Contract. In addition, the Authority reserves the right to extend the Contract by up to five (5) additional years, through two separate extension options:\n\u2022 One extension of three (3) years\n\u2022 One extension of two (2) years\nIf both extension options are exercised, the maximum potential duration of the Contract would be ten (10) years.\nThe estimated contract value of \u00a31,910,000.00, as stated in this Contract Notice, is based on the Authority awarding the contract at its maximum budget of \u00a3935,000 for the initial 5-year core term, and subsequently exercising all five optional extension years. For the extension period (years 6 to 10), an estimated annual inflation rate of 4% has been applied to reflect projected cost increases over time.\nThe estimated value is provided in good faith to assist Suppliers in preparing their Tenders. It does not constitute a commitment by the Authority to spend the full amount. No stated value shall create a binding financial obligation unless explicitly confirmed within the Contract.",
    "documents": [
      {
        "description": "Competitive Flexible Procedure Procurement",
        "documentType": "biddingDocuments",
        "id": "L-4",
        "url": "https://procontract.due-north.com//FileUploads/ViewAttachment?attachmentId=f990465c-d694-f011-813a-005056b64545\u0026entityTypeId=b5c83c15-39cd-480e-b232-0e94cac4b464\u0026attachmentTypeId=FtsDocument"
      },
      {
        "description": "Contract Schedule 1 (Service Specification)",
        "documentType": "biddingDocuments",
        "id": "L-6",
        "url": "https://procontract.due-north.com//FileUploads/ViewAttachment?attachmentId=4b10167e-d694-f011-813a-005056b64545\u0026entityTypeId=b5c83c15-39cd-480e-b232-0e94cac4b464\u0026attachmentTypeId=FtsDocument"
      },
      {
        "description": "Contract Terms and Conditions",
        "documentType": "biddingDocuments",
        "id": "L-7",
        "url": "https://procontract.due-north.com//FileUploads/ViewAttachment?attachmentId=c2aca98c-d694-f011-813a-005056b64545\u0026entityTypeId=b5c83c15-39cd-480e-b232-0e94cac4b464\u0026attachmentTypeId=FtsDocument"
      },
      {
        "description": "Social Value Tender Response Template",
        "documentType": "biddingDocuments",
        "id": "L-8",
        "url": "https://procontract.due-north.com//FileUploads/ViewAttachment?attachmentId=94c2f092-d694-f011-813a-005056b64545\u0026entityTypeId=b5c83c15-39cd-480e-b232-0e94cac4b464\u0026attachmentTypeId=FtsDocument"
      },
      {
        "description": "Price Tender Response Template",
        "documentType": "biddingDocuments",
        "id": "L-9",
        "url": "https://procontract.due-north.com//FileUploads/ViewAttachment?attachmentId=14bbb7a5-d694-f011-813a-005056b64545\u0026entityTypeId=b5c83c15-39cd-480e-b232-0e94cac4b464\u0026attachmentTypeId=FtsDocument"
      },
      {
        "description": "Procurement Specific Questionnaire (PSQ)",
        "documentType": "biddingDocuments",
        "id": "L-10",
        "url": "https://procontract.due-north.com//FileUploads/ViewAttachment?attachmentId=23ad35af-d694-f011-813a-005056b64545\u0026entityTypeId=b5c83c15-39cd-480e-b232-0e94cac4b464\u0026attachmentTypeId=FtsDocument"
      },
      {
        "description": "Not published",
        "documentType": "conflictOfInterest",
        "id": "conflictOfInterest"
      },
      {
        "datePublished": "2025-09-18T22:51:06+01:00",
        "description": "Tender notice on Find a Tender",
        "documentType": "tenderNotice",
        "format": "text/html",
        "id": "057925-2025",
        "noticeType": "UK4",
        "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/057925-2025"
      }
    ],
    "enquiryPeriod": {
      "endDate": "2025-09-29T14:00:00+01:00"
    },
    "expressionOfInterestDeadline": "2025-10-06T14:00:00+01:00",
    "id": "DN791264",
    "items": [
      {
        "additionalClassifications": [
          {
            "description": "Software package and information systems",
            "id": "48000000",
            "scheme": "CPV"
          },
          {
            "description": "IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support",
            "id": "72000000",
            "scheme": "CPV"
          }
        ],
        "deliveryAddresses": [
          {
            "country": "GB",
            "countryName": "United Kingdom",
            "region": "UKK3"
          }
        ],
        "id": "1",
        "relatedLot": "1"
      }
    ],
    "legalBasis": {
      "id": "2023/54",
      "scheme": "UKPGA",
      "uri": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/54/contents"
    },
    "lots": [
      {
        "awardCriteria": {
          "criteria": [
            {
              "description": "\u2022 Responses to 28 quality questions grouped into 10 sections aligned to the Service Specification \u2013 35%\n\u2022 Responses to four method statement asks addressing the Authority\u2019s deliverables and outcomes \u2013 10%\n\u2022 Responses to two case study asks evidencing successful delivery of similar outcomes \u2013 5%\n\u2022 Software demonstration of ESM solution capabilities against the Authority\u2019s requirements \u2013 10%\n\u2022 Social Value \u2013 Part A: Quantitative response to the CC1 measure (donations or in-kind contributions to local community projects in relation to connectivity \u2013 \u00a3 \u0026 materials) \u2013 5%\n\u2022 Social Value \u2013 Part B: Qualitative response to the CC1 measure (donations or in-kind contributions to local community projects in relation to connectivity \u2013 \u00a3 \u0026 materials) \u2013 5%",
              "name": "Quality",
              "numbers": [
                {
                  "number": 70.0,
                  "weight": "percentageExact"
                }
              ],
              "type": "quality"
            },
            {
              "description": "\u2022 Supplier\u2019s Price Response for delivering their ESM solution over the 5-year core term, meeting all mandatory and any committed optional requirements in the Service Specification \u2013 25%\n\u2022 Completion of four maximum day rate cards for deploying personnel aligned to SFIA9 roles and levels of responsibility \u2013 5%",
              "name": "Price",
              "numbers": [
                {
                  "number": 30.0,
                  "weight": "percentageExact"
                }
              ],
              "type": "price"
            }
          ]
        },
        "contractPeriod": {
          "endDate": "2031-02-18T23:59:59+00:00",
          "maxExtentDate": "2036-02-18T23:59:59+00:00",
          "startDate": "2026-02-19T00:00:00+00:00"
        },
        "hasOptions": true,
        "hasRenewal": true,
        "id": "1",
        "options": {
          "description": "The Authority may exercise options for additional or repeat purchases of goods, services, or works that are consistent with the scope of the original contract, including the extension of the contract beyond its original term and the implementation of optional elements as described in the procurement documentation. These options will be exercised in accordance with the provisions of the Procurement Act 2023, ensuring they do not materially alter the nature of the contract or breach principles of transparency and equal treatment."
        },
        "renewal": {
          "description": "One extension of three (3) years with an anticipated Contract period of 19.02.2031 to 18.02.2034 .\nOne extension of two (2) year with an anticipated Contract period of 19.02.2034 to 18.02.2036.\nThe Authority reserves the right to implement the optional contract extensions."
        },
        "selectionCriteria": {
          "criteria": [
            {
              "description": "Please refer to the Procurement Specific Questionnaire and other procurement documents attached to this Contract Notice for full details of the conditions of participation. The following is an extract of some economic and financial standing elements to be assessed by the Authority.\nTurnover - This criterion assesses whether the Supplier has sufficient financial resources to deliver the Contract. The turnover requirement is set at two times the estimated annual value of the Contract. For this procurement, the estimated annual value is \u00a3180,000, resulting in a required annual turnover of \u00a3360,000.\nLiquidity - This criterion evaluates the Supplier\u2019s ability to meet short-term obligations by comparing liquid assets to current liabilities. The Authority\u0027s minimum acceptable standard for the calculated Acid Test Ratio is: \u2265 1.0. \nGearing - This criterion assesses the Supplier\u2019s financial leverage, indicating the proportion of debt to equity. The Authority\u0027s minimum acceptable standard for the calculated Gearing Ratio is: \u003c 90%  \nNet Profit Margin - This criterion assesses the Supplier\u2019s profitability over the last two financial years. The Authority\u0027s minimum acceptable standard for the calculated Average Net Profit Margin is: \u003c 0% ",
              "type": "economic"
            },
            {
              "description": "Please refer to the Procurement Specific Questionnaire and other procurement documents attached to this Contract Notice for full details of the conditions of participation. The following is an extract of some technical and professional ability elements to be assessed by the Authority.\nSuppliers must submit three case studies, each limited to 500 words, demonstrating how they meet the case study criteria. In addition, the contract details table must be completed for both case studies to provide clear, quantitative data supporting the responses. Completion of the contract details table is excluded from the 500-word limit per case study. The minimum thresholds that must be met or exceeded are:\n\u2022 Each case study must relate to a formal contractual arrangement involving the successful implementation, migration, and ongoing support/maintenance of Enterprise Service Management (ESM) software.\n\u2022 Both case studies must reference public sector customers and contracts. The same customer may be referenced in both case studies, but the contracts must be distinct.\n\u2022 Each contract must have been active within the last five years from the date of this Procurement\u2019s publication. Contracts that expired or were terminated more than five years ago will not be accepted.\n\u2022 Each contract must have provided software access for at least 2,000 staff within the referenced customer\u2019s organisation. \nSuppliers are required to respond to a series of project-specific technical and professional ability questions within their PSQ Response. These questions are assessed on a Pass/Fail basis, and any response of \u201cNo\u201d may result in a Fail for this section. Each response must be supported by a succinct statement of evidence, regardless of whether the answer is \u201cYes\u201d or \u201cNo\u201d. The Authority reserves the right to investigate and validate any responses provided. The Pass/Fail questions include the Supplier confirmation of the following:\n\u2022 Ability to deliver all mandatory requirements outlined in Schedule 1 (Service Specification), as well as any optional requirements committed to in the Tender. A completed copy of Schedule 1, indicating compliance or non-compliance against each requirement, must be attached to the PSQ submission.\n\u2022 Ability to deliver all mandatory and committed optional requirements within the five-year core Contract period, for a total Contract price not exceeding \u00a3935,000 (the Authority\u2019s maximum budget envelope).\n\u2022 Ability to deliver the implementation and migration to the proposed ESM solution, meeting all mandatory and committed optional requirements, within Year 1 of the core Contract period, for a cost not exceeding \u00a335,000.\n\u2022 Ability to complete the implementation and migration of the proposed ESM solution, including all mandatory and committed optional requirements, within six (6) months from the date of Contract award.\n\u2022 That no software licences, consumption-based charges, or support and maintenance fees related to live operation will apply until the proposed ESM solution is fully implemented and the Authority has successfully migrated. The Authority also reserves the right to delay licence activation\u2014regardless of implementation status\u2014to manage transitional cost exposure, with any such delay capped at six (6) months from the point of successful implementation and migration.",
              "type": "technical"
            },
            {
              "description": "Primary Award Criteria\nPrice \u2013 30%\n\u2022 Supplier\u2019s Price Response for delivering their ESM solution over the 5-year core term, meeting all mandatory and any committed optional requirements in the Service Specification \u2013 25%\n\u2022 Completion of four maximum day rate cards for deploying personnel aligned to SFIA9 roles and levels of responsibility \u2013 5%\nQuality \u2013 70%\n\u2022 Responses to 28 quality questions grouped into 10 sections aligned to the Service Specification \u2013 35%\n\u2022 Responses to four method statement asks addressing the Authority\u2019s deliverables and outcomes \u2013 10%\n\u2022 Responses to two case study asks evidencing successful delivery of similar outcomes \u2013 5%\n\u2022 Software demonstration of ESM solution capabilities against the Authority\u2019s requirements \u2013 10%\n\u2022 Social Value \u2013 Part A: Quantitative response to the CC1 measure (donations or in-kind contributions to local community projects in relation to connectivity \u2013 \u00a3 \u0026 materials) \u2013 5%\n\u2022 Social Value \u2013 Part B: Qualitative response to the CC1 measure (donations or in-kind contributions to local community projects in relation to connectivity \u2013 \u00a3 \u0026 materials) \u2013 5%\nTotal Tender Score: 100%\nFurther breakdowns and associated weightings of specific elements within each sub-criterion are detailed in the procurement documents. The evaluation process and submission requirements are also fully outlined within the procurement documentation to ensure transparency and clarity for all participating suppliers.",
              "forReduction": true
            }
          ]
        },
        "status": "active",
        "suitability": {
          "sme": true,
          "vcse": true
        },
        "value": {
          "amount": 1910000,
          "amountGross": 2292000,
          "currency": "GBP"
        }
      }
    ],
    "mainProcurementCategory": "services",
    "procedure": {
      "features": "This procurement will be conducted using the Competitive Flexible Procedure, structured across four distinct stages. At each stage, suppliers must meet specific requirements to progress:\nStage 1 \u2013 Procurement Specific Questionnaire (PSQ): Suppliers will complete a PSQ assessed on a pass/fail basis against a series of compliance checks and minimum threshold criteria. Only those meeting all requirements will proceed to Stage 2.\nStage 2 \u2013 Tender Evaluation: Suppliers who pass the PSQ will have their tenders evaluated against quality and price criteria. The top five scoring suppliers from this stage will be invited to participate in Stage 3.\nStage 3 \u2013 Software Demonstrations: The five down-selected suppliers will be required to submit pre-recorded software demonstrations, which will be evaluated by the Authority. Scores from this stage will be combined with Stage 2 tender scores to identify the preferred bidder.\nStage 4 \u2013 Post-Evaluation Negotiation: The Authority reserves the right to enter into post-evaluation negotiations with the preferred bidder, provided that such negotiations do not materially change the contract or disadvantage suppliers based on the outcome of the Stage 2 or Stage 3 evaluations.\nFull and comprehensive details of the criteria, evaluation methodology, and procedural requirements are provided in the attached procurement documents."
    },
    "procurementMethod": "selective",
    "procurementMethodDetails": "Competitive flexible procedure",
    "riskDetails": "The winning Supplier must identify, communicate, manage and monitor risks as their part of their ongoing Contract management activities. The Suppliers tendering for this opportunity must address risk management in the relevant aspects of their Tender submission. The Authority will evaluate the Suppliers approach to risk management as part of the relevant Tender evaluation criteria. The following paragraphs briefly describe some critical risks that the Authority has identified for this Procurement and subsequent Contract.\nThe Authority is currently facing organisation-wide budgetary pressures, which may limit the funding available to support this Procurement and the resulting Contract. To mitigate this risk, the Authority has set a fixed maximum budget of \u00a3935,000 for the five (5) year core term of the Contract. Any Tender submissions that exceed this maximum budget will be deemed unaffordable and rejected.\nThe transition from the Authority\u2019s existing on-premise ITSM software to the new cloud-hosted ESM solution is expected to involve a complex implementation and data migration process. There is a risk that this transition could disrupt business continuity, potentially affecting the delivery of services to users. To address this, the Authority has embedded evaluation criteria within the Procurement that require Suppliers to demonstrate how they will mitigate this risk and ensure continuity of service throughout the transition.\nThe Authority is experiencing constraints in personnel resources, which may affect the availability of staff to support activities under the Contract. This is particularly relevant during the implementation and migration phases, where technical input, service reconfiguration, and user training may be required. The Authority has included evaluation criteria that invite Suppliers to propose approaches for mitigating the impact of limited internal resources and ensuring successful delivery.\nDuring the implementation and migration period, the Authority will continue operating its existing ITSM tool, resulting in a potential overlap of costs between the legacy and new systems. To mitigate this, the Authority has capped the maximum budget for implementation and migration activities in Year 1 of the Contract at \u00a335,000.\nSuppliers must confirm that no software licences will be activated, nor will any consumption-based charges or support and maintenance fees associated with the live operation of the software be applied, until the proposed Enterprise Service Management (ESM) solution has been fully implemented and the Authority has successfully migrated to the new system. Additionally, the Authority reserves the right to specify a delayed licence activation date, regardless of implementation status, to manage cost exposure during the transition period. However, this delay shall be capped at a maximum of six (6) months from the point of successful completion of the solution\u2019s implementation and the Authority\u2019s migration to the new system.\nAny software licensing costs that may be incurred to facilitate the implementation and migration activities\u2014prior to full activation\u2014must be fully accounted for within the \u00a335,000 implementation budget envelope. This measure is intended to mitigate the financial risk of overlapping contract costs between the legacy and new systems, which would be deemed unaffordable given the Authority\u2019s constrained budget position.",
    "status": "active",
    "submissionMethodDetails": "https://www.supplyingthesouthwest.org.uk/\nAll communications and submissions at every stage of this procurement must be done through the Proactis ProContract e-procurement portal used by the Authority. The attached procurement documents contain information on how to access this opportunity through the referenced e-procurement portal.",
    "submissionTerms": {
      "electronicSubmissionPolicy": "allowed",
      "languages": [
        "en"
      ]
    },
    "title": "Enterprise Service Management (ESM)",
    "value": {
      "amount": 1910000,
      "amountGross": 2292000,
      "currency": "GBP"
    }
  }
}