Buyer Name: Stoke on Trent City Council
Buyer Address: Civic Centre, Glebe Street, Stoke-on-Trent, UKG23, ST4 1HH, United Kingdom
Contact Name: William Stuart
Contact Email: categorymanagement@stoke.gov.uk
Buyer Name: Stoke on Trent City Council
Buyer Address: Civic Centre, Glebe Street, Stoke-on-Trent, UKG23, ST4 1HH, United Kingdom
Contact Name: William Stuart
Contact Email: categorymanagement@stoke.gov.uk
To appoint a principle contractor to undertake exterior repair and internal refurbishment of building 1F for use by the Spode Museum Trust. Scope: • Roof repair • Window repair/replacement • M&E • Small amount of asbestos removal • Internal refurbishment
No linked documents found for this notice.
External Link: https://supplystokeandstaffs.proactishosting.com/
External Link: https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/081508-2025
Link Description: Tender notice on Find a Tender
Lot 1 Status: active
Lot 1 Value: GBP 200,000
Lot 1 Value (Gross): GBP 240,000
Lot 1 Contract Start: 2026-02-02T00:00:00Z
Lot 1 Contract End: 2026-07-31T23:59:59+01:00
Lot 1 SME Suitable: Yes
Document Description: Tender notice on Find a Tender
{
"buyer": {
"id": "GB-PPON-PDQZ-1442-RZTZ",
"name": "Stoke on Trent City Council"
},
"date": "2025-12-10T13:45:38Z",
"id": "081508-2025",
"initiationType": "tender",
"language": "en",
"ocid": "ocds-h6vhtk-05f2c4",
"parties": [
{
"address": {
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom",
"locality": "Stoke-on-Trent",
"postalCode": "ST4 1HH",
"region": "UKG23",
"streetAddress": "Civic Centre, Glebe Street"
},
"contactPoint": {
"email": "categorymanagement@stoke.gov.uk",
"name": "William Stuart"
},
"details": {
"classifications": [
{
"description": "Public authority - sub-central government",
"id": "publicAuthoritySubCentralGovernment",
"scheme": "UK_CA_TYPE"
}
]
},
"id": "GB-PPON-PDQZ-1442-RZTZ",
"identifier": {
"id": "PDQZ-1442-RZTZ",
"scheme": "GB-PPON"
},
"name": "Stoke on Trent City Council",
"roles": [
"buyer"
]
}
],
"tag": [
"tender"
],
"tender": {
"aboveThreshold": false,
"description": "To appoint a principle contractor to undertake exterior repair and internal refurbishment of building 1F for use by the Spode Museum Trust.\nScope:\n\u2022\tRoof repair\n\u2022\tWindow repair/replacement\n\u2022\tM\u0026E\n\u2022\tSmall amount of asbestos removal\n\u2022\tInternal refurbishment",
"documents": [
{
"documentType": "biddingDocuments",
"id": "L-1",
"url": "https://supplystokeandstaffs.proactishosting.com/"
},
{
"datePublished": "2025-12-10T13:45:38Z",
"description": "Tender notice on Find a Tender",
"documentType": "tenderNotice",
"format": "text/html",
"id": "081508-2025",
"noticeType": "UK4",
"url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/081508-2025"
}
],
"id": "HDG/2025/962",
"items": [
{
"additionalClassifications": [
{
"description": "Building construction work",
"id": "45210000",
"scheme": "CPV"
},
{
"description": "Engineering works and construction works",
"id": "45220000",
"scheme": "CPV"
},
{
"description": "Roof works and other special trade construction works",
"id": "45260000",
"scheme": "CPV"
}
],
"deliveryAddresses": [
{
"country": "GB",
"countryName": "United Kingdom",
"region": "UKG23"
}
],
"id": "1",
"relatedLot": "1"
}
],
"legalBasis": {
"id": "2023/54",
"scheme": "UKPGA",
"uri": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/54/contents"
},
"lots": [
{
"awardCriteria": {
"description": "The tender evaluation is divided into two stages - the Procurement Supplier Questionnaire and the Award Stage evaluation, as detailed below.\nThe standard PSQ Evaluation pertains to the evaluation of Parts 2, 3 \u0026 4 (Qualification Questionnaire) of the tender document. Your self declaration element of this selection stage will only be checked for the winning supplier before award, unless it is necessary to check at an earlier stage to ensure the proper conduct of the procedure.\nThere are a number of project specific selection stage questions which are deemed relevant and proportionate to this contract. To ensure proper conduct of the procedure they will be assessed prior to the second stage evaluation for all bidders.\nPLEASE NOTE: With regards to the PSQ (Qualification Questionnaire) which relate to Parts 2, 3 and 4 it should be noted that you must achieve a PASS for each part of these evaluations in order for your tender to be compliant. A FAIL for 1 or more of these questions will result in your tender submission being disqualified.\nThe Award Stage Evaluation will be based on the tender award criteria Most Advantageous Tender (MAT). This pertains to the Technical Questionnaire Section of the tender document in respect of the qualitative evaluation and the Commercial Questionnaire section of the tender document in respect of the pricing evaluation.\nTechnical (Quality) Evaluation\nThe maximum MAT score of 100 marks is broken down into 60 marks for the Technical (QUALITY) evaluation and 40 marks for the Commercial (Price) evaluation. Tenderers are required to complete the Technical and Commercial Questionnaire sections of the tender document accordingly.\nThe 60 marks available for the Technical (Quality) evaluation is further broken down into a number of sub- criteria as follows:\n17 marks - Ensuring the safety of and minimised disruption to other site users\n17 marks - Programme of works\n16 marks - Heritage related issues will be considered\n10 marks - Social Value\nThe score for each of the above technical criteria will be arrived at by applying the mechanism detailed below:\nScoring mechanism\nScore 5 marks - where the evidence demonstrates that all of the tender requirements have been met. Response provided is excellent.\nScore 4 marks - where the evidence demonstrates that most of the tender requirements have been met. Response provided is good.\nScore 3 marks - where the evidence demonstrates that some of the tender requirements have been met. Response provided is satisfactory.\nScore 2 marks - where the evidence demonstrates clear gaps in meeting the tender requirements and is not comprehensive. Response provided is below average.\nScore 1 mark - where the evidence demonstrates a significant flaw in meeting the tender requirements. Response provided is poor\nScore 0 marks - where no information is provided for the relevant criteria.\nCommercial evaluation\nThe 40 marks applicable to the Commercial (Price) evaluation will be calculated using the following formulae: Lowest total tender price divided by bidders total tender price (ie the bid under consideration) multiplied by 40 = marks awarded.\n(For clarity the total commercial score will be to 2 decimal places)\nTotal Score\nThe Technical and Commercial scores will then be added together to give an overall score out of 100 marks to provide the overall ranking.\n(For clarity, the total M.A.T score will be to 2 decimal places)"
},
"contractPeriod": {
"endDate": "2026-07-31T23:59:59+01:00",
"startDate": "2026-02-02T00:00:00Z"
},
"id": "1",
"status": "active",
"suitability": {
"sme": true
},
"value": {
"amount": 200000,
"amountGross": 240000,
"currency": "GBP"
}
}
],
"mainProcurementCategory": "works",
"procurementMethod": "open",
"procurementMethodDetails": "Below threshold - open competition",
"status": "active",
"submissionMethodDetails": "https://supplystokeandstaffs.proactishosting.com/",
"submissionTerms": {
"electronicSubmissionPolicy": "allowed"
},
"tenderPeriod": {
"endDate": "2026-01-19T12:00:00Z"
},
"title": "Spode 1F Works - HDG/2025/962",
"value": {
"amount": 200000,
"amountGross": 240000,
"currency": "GBP"
}
}
}